Legal Opinion

Dubois v. Wilkes-Barre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1963No. Appeal, 275PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff sued for injuries, suffered from a fall on a public sidewalk, allegedly caused by the existence of an accumulation of melted ice cream and grease thereon. The trial judge entered a compulsory nonsuit, which the court en banc refused to disturb. Plaintiff appeals.

The action of the court below was correct. The plaintiff’s testimony failed to establish what caused her to fall. In order to establish liability in an action of this nature, it is necessary for the plaintiff to prove what actually caused the accident, not what might possibly have caused it. The jury cannot…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rinaldi v. LevineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Burns v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Hillelson v. RennerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Gayne v. Philip Carey Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Sellers Et Ux. v. ClineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kardibin v. Associated HardwareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Burke v. Leader Dogs for the BlindDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. McDermott v. Travellers Air Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Antonucci v. Sun Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. D. Shirey v. BARTA & Berks County Assoc. for the Blind, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API