Legal Opinion
Puro v. Puro
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArnold G-uy Fraiman, J.
This action for a declaratory judgment and specific performance involves the ownership of stock of a family-owned corporation known as Purofied Down Products Corporation (Purofied), as well as the ownership of certain real estate parcels. The latter issue was severed and a triál was had solely on the issue of the stock ownership. The parties to the action are the three Puro brothers, Arthur, Jacob and Louis, and the executors of the estates of their deceased brothers, Joseph, and Sam.
It was originally the position of Arthur and Jacob that all of the outstanding stock of Purofied belonged to a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Orr v. . Doubleday, Page Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Jacoby v. . JacobyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Gram v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Bradley v. RoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament De RyckeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of DoranNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978
- Puro v. PuroNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Puro v. PuroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Puro v. Travelers '72 Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975