Legal Opinion

Louisville Car Wheel & Railway Supply Co. v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 1, 1912PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, First Division).

1Opinion of the Court

*574Opinion of the Court by

Judge Lassing

Affirming.

This litigation is the outgrowth of an effort on the part of the city of Louisville to collect taxes for the years 1909 and 1910 on the property of the Louisville Car Wheel and Railway Supply Company. The defendant, in its answer, pleaded that under section 170 of the Constitution, section 2988 of the Kentucky Statutes, and an ordinance of the city of Louisville, adopted July 29, 1898, it was exempt from the payment of taxes for a period of five years, and particularly for the two years for which the city sought a recovery. A demurrer was filed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. Louisville Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  2. Commonwealth v. TiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Specht v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilentz v. HendricksonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Crutcher v. KoelnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Sanderson v. BatemanMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Bingham's Administrator v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. City of Louisville v. Louisville Tin & Stove Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API