Cronan v. Succession of McDonogh
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Second District Court of New Orleans, Lea, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, C. J.
We consider the objections to the form of the action virtually determined by the decree of this court remanding the cause in order to make parties. See case, 9 An. 302.
*270The plaintiff Oronan and the appellants, the Cities of Baltimore and New Orleans, the universel legatees under the will of McBonogh, claim title through A. Hodge, Jr.
The act of sale from Hodge to Oonrey was duly recorded, and although junior to the auction sale under which the legatees of MeBonogh claim, must nevertheless prevail over it, because among other reasons it does not appear that the auctioneers were authorized in…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Harang v. Gheens Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Third Dist. Land Co. v. LassereSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Silverstein v. KoppelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928