Ortman v. Ortman

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant moved for suspension of his future child support payments on the ground that plaintiff unjustifiably denied him his right to visitation {see generally, Matter of Orange County Dept, of Social Servs. [Tibaldi] v Meehan, 252 AD2d 588, 590; Hiross v Hiross, 224 AD2d 662, 663; Matter of Hecht v Hecht, 222 AD2d 589). In response to the motion, the Law Guardian alleged that there was an issue of fact whether plaintiff deliberately…