Legal Opinion · Dissent

Polly's Properties, LLC v. Department of Taxes

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 21, 2010No. 2009-124Published

1Dissent

Johnson, J.,

¶ 13. dissenting. The fundamental inquiry at the heart of statutory interpretation is to ascertain the plain meaning of a statute’s words in light of its legislative purpose. Today, the majority ignores this tenet of judicial review in favor of an approach that first infuses ambiguity into an unambiguous statute and then tasks this Court with rewriting the tax-exemption provision under 32 V.S.A. §9603(24) to ease the burden that compliance with the deadline imposes on taxpayers. Because I agree with the trial court that a transfer of property to a limited liability company (LLC)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Colwell v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. Burlington Electric Department v. Vermont Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Adoptions of B.L.V.B.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. In re Estate of CoteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API