Legal Opinion

Wickizer v. Whitney

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1936No. 23463. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Herrick

Under appropriate pleadings originated by the filing by the appellant of a complaint for partition of real estate which the decedent owned at her death, a construction of the will of Rachel C. Probert, deceased, was sought in the circuit court of Kane county.

The testatrix, a resident of Kane county, died testate on June 30, 1934, leaving surviving no husband, parents, descendants, brothers or sisters, but leaving certain next of kin as her only heirs-at-law. Her will was duly admitted to probate. The first paragraph of her will is as follows: “Be it known that I, Rachel C. Probert, of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bond v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Munie v. GruenewaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Guerin v. GuerinIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Engelthaler v. EngelthalerIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Dorsey v. DodsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vollmer v. McGowanIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Caracci v. SchnaedterIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Estate of Betts v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  4. Davis v. Attic ClubAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Watkins v. NobilingIllinois Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API