Henry James v. H-Mart Northwest Headquarters Office, et al.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 HENRY JAMES, CASE NO. 2:25-cv-01781-JHC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 H-MART NORTHWEST 11 HEADQUARTERS OFFICE, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 This matter comes before the Court sua sponte on pro se Plaintiff Henry James’s 15 Complaint (Dkt. # 5) and Motion to Serve Summons by the U.S. Marshals (Dkt. # 6). 16 “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” Richardson v. United States,
943 F.2d 17 1107, 1112
(9th Cir. 1991). “The plaintiff bears the burden of proving the existence of 18 jurisdiction.” Haisten v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- L.R. Bretz v. Zollie Kelman, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. WelbornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.