Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 10, 1921No. 9926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Claim denied. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Charles C. Butler, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This case, like a great majority of those having their origin with the State Industrial Commission contains no intelligent or sufficient statement or finding of fact by that body as is required by law.

The purported findings are confined entirely to the following :

“The Industrial Commission, on the 12th day of October, A. D. 1917, after having read and considered all of the evidence finds:

That the said A. C. Weaver on or about the 24th day of November, A. D. 1915, while performing duties arising out of and in the course of his employment as an employe of the said Mountain Motor Fuel Company by…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hardy v. City of Tarpon SpringsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Southeastern Express Co. v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Empire Health & Accident Insurance v. PurcellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Crawford v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  5. Tague v. Coors Porcelain CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API