Hodson v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.
The plaintiff is the commissioner of public welfare of the city of New York. The defendant is the New York City Employees’ Retirement System. The plaintiff demands judgment: (1) That the defendant pay to him, pursuant to a warrant of seizure, *481dated February 27, 1934, the sum of $335.67, which represents the fl.ccnmn1fl.tPid deductions and interest to the credit of Carl Foster in the annuity savings fund, together with interest, for the support and maintenance of the said Carl Foster’s abandoned wife and child. (2) That, upon payment to the plaintiff of the aforesaid sum of $335.67, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Wetmore v. . WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Corn Exch. Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Zwingmann v. ZwingmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Coler v. Corn Exchange BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wissner v. WissnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Schlaefer v. SchlaeferCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Faus v. FausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Bagnall v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Ogle v. HeimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.