Legal Opinion

Bach v. Brown

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from district court, Salt Lake county; A. N. Cherry, Judge. Action by George W. Brown against John M. Bach on a promissory note. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Babtch, J.:

- This action was commenced in the district court of Tooele county to recover a certain sum alleged to be due on a promissory note. The defendant demurred to the complaint on the grounds that it failed to state a cause of action, and that it appeared on its face that the court had no jurisdiction. The demurrer was overruled, and the defendant failing to answer, judgment was entered against him.

The decisive question presented, on his appeal from the judgment, is whether the court had jurisdiction to try the *437cause. The note set out in the complaint appears to hare been executed by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wallace v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Hibernia National Bank v. . LacombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Burckle v. . EckhartNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  4. Parker v. EnslowIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Lee v. . SelleckNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lawson v. TrippUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Woodward v. EdmundsUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Motherstadt v. Harry Newman, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Sanipoli v. Pleasant Valley Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Hecla Gold Mining Co. v. GisbornUtah Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API