Legal Opinion

Riggin v. Dierdorff

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 25, 1990No. 90-38PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellees, Donald and Eunice Dierdorff, owned a lot in Fairfield Bay and appellee, Savers Federal Savings and Loan Association (Savers), held a promissory note and mortgage under which the Dierdorffs made payments for the land. Later, on October 17,1982, the Dierdorffs sold the lot to the appellants, Donald and Norma Riggin, for $67,000.00. Under the parties’ sale contract, the Riggins agreed to pay the Dierdorffs a $20,000.00 down payment plus $7,700.00 at 10% interest over a five-year period. They further agreed to pay the balance amount of $39,300.00 due Savers on a note…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Colclasure v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Cole v. MetteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Valley v. BogardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. National Bank of Arkansas v. River Crossing Partners, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. TallantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. RMP RENTALS v. Metroplex, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Tilley v. Malvern National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API