Legal Opinion

Krom v. Friend, Crosby & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 9, 1934No. Nos. 29,654, 29,655PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

On defendant’s objection the trial court refused to settle and allow a proposed case because the stay had expired. Plaintiffs applied to this court for an alternative writ of mandamus directing the trial court to settle and alloAv the proposed case or show cause why it should not be done. At the hearing both plaintiffs and defendant appeared by their respective attorneys, filed briefs and argued the matter orally, and on May 11, 1934, this court filed its decision and issued a peremptory writ of mandamus directing the trial court to settle and allow a record of the testimony and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dayton v. CraikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  2. Stebbins v. Friend, Crosby & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stebbins v. Friend, Crosby & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API