Legal Opinion
Armen Manukian v. Procida Construction Corp. New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 22, 2026No. 1:23-cv-10249Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ARMEN MANUKIAN, Plaintiff, ~ against - OPINION & ORDER 23 Civ. 10249 (ER) PROCIDA CONSTRUCTION CORP. NEW YORK, Defendant. Ramos, D.J.: Armen Manukian, proceeding pro se, brought this action against Procida Construction Corp., alleging claims of unpaid wages and discrimination. Doc. 2. On September 5, 2025, the Court granted Procida’s motion for summary judgment on all of Manukian’s claims. Doc. 33. Before the Court is Manukian’s motion for reconsideration. Doc. 35. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED. I. Background…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Kolel Beth Yechiel Mechil of Tartikov, Inc. v. YLL Irrevocable TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Aczel v. LaboniaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Johnson v. Carlo Lizza & Sons Paving, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016