Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1ConcurrenceMcCALEB, Justice
I am in accord with the conclusion that plaintiff- has suffered a permanent partial disability and that, therefore, compensation was payable under paragraph (c), subsection 1, section 8 of Act 20 of 1914, as amended, Act No. 242 of 1928, p. 357, since plaintiff was earning a lesser wage than that received previous to the accident. However, I do not coincide in the suggestion that, if the cleaning and pressing business (in which plaintiff is engaged) is not *983manual labor, compensation payments should have been computed at 20% of 65% of his average weekly earnings, as held in Washington v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Washington v. Holmes BarnesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Vilce v. Travelers Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
- Washington v. Holmes Barnes, LimitedSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Sweeney v. Black River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Jarrell v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.