Legal Opinion

St. Louis Agricultural & Mechanical Ass'n v. Delano

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge. The contract, even if it were entered into by defendants, is illegal and void, and could not be enforced, being a Sunday contract. Wág. Stat., secs. 1578, 1580, 1508; Bernard v. Lupping, 33 Mo. 341; Quinn v. Railroad, 20 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge. The contract, even if it were entered into by defendants, is illegal and void, and could not be enforced, being a Sunday contract. Wág. Stat., secs. 1578, 1580, 1508; Bernard v. Lupping, 33 Mo. 341; Quinn v. Railroad, 20 Mo. App. 453; Sheffield v. Balmer, 52 Mo. 474; De Forth v. Railroad, 52 Wis. 329; Robeson v. French, 12 Met. 25; Johnson v. Brown, 13 Kan. 529. The evidence does not establish a contract on the part of the defendants; no authority to bind them was shown. Yolger v. Ray, 131 Mass. 439; Page v. Snow, 12…

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The petition states that the plaintiff “is a corporation, incorporated under the laws of the state of Missouri, and that the defendants, together with persons unknown to the plaintiff, are and were at the times hereinafter stated members of a ’voluntary association known as the Amateur Athletic Association of St. Louis ; that the purpose of said association is to develop and encourage athletic games and sports. The plaintiff further states that it is the owner of a parcel of ground in the city of St. Louis, generally known and designated as the St. Louis Pair Grounds, which parcel of ground…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. LaughlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  2. Sybert v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  3. Cummiskey v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Knox City v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Taussig v. SchieldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shubert Theatrical Co. v. RathCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  2. State v. PratherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Hargadine v. GibbonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Publishers George Knapp & Co. v. CulbertsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. King v. Greves & RuffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API