Legal Opinion

People v. Diaz

California Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2015No. S205145PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.

We granted review to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeal regarding whether a trial court has the duty to instruct a jury to consider a criminal defendant’s out-of-court statements with caution when the statements at issue form the basis of a prosecution for making criminal threats. We also asked the parties to brief whether we should continue to require courts to instruct that a defendant’s out-of-court statements must be viewed with caution even in the absence of a request.

We hold that the cautionary instruction is applicable when the statements at issue…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. People v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. People v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. People v. GrimesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. People v. SalazarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. People v. Wall (Randall)California Supreme Court · 2017

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API