Legal Opinion
Taylor v. GILL EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 19, 1952No. 34345PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
“Where there is no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced, with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom, shall demand a particular verdict, the court may direct the jury to find for the party entitled thereto.” Code, § 110-104. It is only where the evidence adduced demands that the jury find in favor of a certain party that it is proper to direct a verdict for such party. Williams v. Farmers State Bank, 22 Ga. App. 656 (97 S. E. 249). Where the evidence demands a finding that the title and right to possession of the property is in the plaintiff and admits of only one finding…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Capital Automobile Co. v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Dilman Bros. v. Patterson Produce & Commission Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Winton v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Bergan v. Magnus & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peoples Loan & Finance Corporation v. Raymond LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Douglas Motor Sales, Inc. v. Cy Owens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Fountain v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Douglas Motor Sales, Inc. v. Cy Owens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.