Legal Opinion

Schindler v. Austwell Farmers Cooperative

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1992No. D-2616PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Per curiam

Charles Schindler II, a cotton and grain farmer, had an agreement with Austwell Farmers Cooperative which allowed him to purchase agricultural products on account. Austwell charged purchases by Schindler, his father and his cousin to this account. When Schindler refused to pay the balance due on the account, Austwell sued him for breach of contract and fraud. The jury found that Schindler owed $65,722.11 on the account; that he obtained products from Austwell fraudulently, causing damages of $65,722.11; and that Austwell should be awarded punitive damages of $10,000 and attorney fees. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spoljaric v. Percival Tours, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Crim Truck & Tractor Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Schindler v. Austwell Farmers Cooperative, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hill v. Heritage Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
  4. Airborne Freight Corp. v. C.R. Lee Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
  5. Ludlow v. DeBerry, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API