Legal Opinion

People v. Ramkisson

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold J. Rothwax, J.

The defendant herein, charged in a single count indictment with grand larceny in the second degree (Penal Law, § 155.35) has filed an omnibus motion for discovery (CPL 240.20), a bill of particulars (CPL 200.90), and to dismiss the indictment for vagueness (CPL 210.20, subd 1, par [a]; 210.25) and evidentiary insufficiency (CPL 210.30). The defendant also moves under CPL 710.20 to suppress his *536allegedly involuntary statements and certain physical evidence, and under CPL 210.20 (subd 1, par [g]) to dismiss the prosecution as untimely pursuant to CPL…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. LomaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. WashingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Callaway, New York County Courts1984
  2. People v. ChetrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. MulliganNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. SteeleNew York Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API