Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Bergen Brunswig Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 27, 1977PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

151 N.J. Super. 344 (1977)

376 A.2d 1277

PETER HOGAN, PLAINTIFF,

v.

BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided June 27, 1977.

Mr. Richard D. Schibell for plaintiff (Messrs. Shebell & Schibell, attorneys).

Mr. Murray J. Laulicht, for defendant (Messrs. Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin, Kohl & Fisher, attorneys).

YACCARINO, J.S.C.

The issue presented by the facts of this case is whether continued employment constitutes consideration sufficient to support an employee's restrictive covenant not to engage in post-employment solicitation of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. DOYLESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  2. Solari Industries, Inc. v. MaladySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. A. Hollander & Son, Inc. v. Imperial Fur Blending Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  4. Wolf v. Home Insurance Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  5. Wolf v. the Home Insurance Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hogan v. Bergen Brunswig CorporationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API