Poirrier v. Jones
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurrence
BROWN, Justice,
Retired, specially concurring with whom URBIGKIT, Justice, joins.
I concur in the result determined by the majority; however, my reasons for affirming the district court differ slightly from that of the majority.
I would narrow the issue before the court as follows:
Do Wyoming courts have equitable power to alter child support arrearage installment payments set by a responding state in a URESA action?
Numerous courts have held that an order rendered by a responding court in a Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) proceeding should not be considered binding in a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Despain v. DespainIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Howard v. HowardMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
- Banton v. MathersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Campbell v. JenneMontana Supreme Court · 1977
- Oglesby v. OglesbyUtah Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.