Legal Opinion
Erneta v. Princeton Hospital
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 7, 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order. Sunreme Court, New York County, entered January 25, 1978, granting the motion of defendants Wilson and Peter to strike a prior order of attachment, pursuant to Seider v Roth (17 NY2d 111), and to dismiss the causes of action against said defendants for lack of jurisdiction, reversed, on the law, with $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal to appellants, and the motion denied. Notwithstanding Shaffer v Heitner (433 US 186), the Seider v Roth doctrine is alive. (See Baden v Staples, 45 NY2d 889.) As the dissent accurately points out, plaintiffs in this malpractice action were not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Thrasher v. United States Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Seider v. RothNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Simpson v. LoehmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kalman v. NeumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Holzsager v. Valley HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Morehouse v. AktiengesellschaftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Saraceno v. SC Johnson & Son, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Uman v. TimpaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980