Barton v. Barton

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant, plaintiff in a divorce action in the court below, contends that the lower court erred when it granted appellee’s exceptions to the master’s recommendation that a di-' vorce a. v. m. 1 be entered in appellant’s favor. We agree, and, therefore, reverse the order of the lower court.

On October 17, 1974, appellant-husband filed a complaint in divorce in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County. After the parties completed discovery, the lower court appointed a master to take testimony in the contested action. On February 21, 1975, the master conducted a hearing at…