Legal Opinion

Bloch v. Egert

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 14, 1934Published

1Per curiam

This was an action of replevin, the dispute being between two chattel mortgagees, as to priority of the respective mortgages. The trial was without jury. The judge found, and *446the evidence justified him in finding, that plaintiff’s mortgage, though dated on September 30th, was in fact executed and delivered on the afternoon of September 29th, to the knowledge of the defendant, and recorded at ten-fifty-two on the morning of the 30th; and that defendant’s mortgage was executed on the morning of the 30th and recorded on that day at ten-eight a. m., shortly before plaintiff’s mortgage. It is not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MerraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
  2. Booth v. KeeganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  3. Hasselbusch v. MohmkingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  4. Connolly v. Public Service Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  5. Klemmt v. YeskelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API