Legal Opinion

Dorr v. Harkness

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On certiorari bringing up a judgment of the Essex Common Pleas reversing a judgment of a District Court in-Newark.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Magie, J.

The action in the District Court was brought by Dorr against Harkness to recover rent reserved on a lease-of land whereon stood a house, barn and outbuildings.

Harkness admitted that the rent claimed was unpaid, but denied his liability. His defence was based on the provisions-of the supplement to the Landlord and Tenant act, approved March 5th, 1874 (Rev., p. 576, § 28), which enacts that whenever any building or buildings erected on leased premises shall be injured by fire, without the fault of the lessee, the-landlord shall repair the same…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Webb v. . R., W. and O.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brinton v. School Dist. of Shenango Twp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Sparks v. Lead Belt Beer Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Lefeber v. GoldinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Morton v. LatimerDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1925
  5. Mumma v. Club Plan of America, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API