Legal Opinion
State v. Bartlett
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 10, 1979No. 228-78PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.
Tried by jury, defendant Bartlett was acquitted of utterance of a forged instrument (13 V.S.A. § 1802) and convicted of passing counterfeit currency (13 V.S.A. § 1804). He appeals his conviction. Two rulings are assigned as error. The trial court denied defendant’s post-trial motion for mistrial or new trial, and after denying full cross-examination of the State’s principal witness, one Burns, refused to strike his entire testimony.
In many respects the trial was not a model one. The events upon which the post-trial motions were based cannot be briefly summarized. They were brought out in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. John Cardillo, Lawrence Harris, Ralph Kaminsky, John Knapp, Louis Margolis, and Louis PiselliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. LaRicheCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- State v. OvittSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- People v. VealAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- State v. WoodardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BondurantTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HohmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.