Legal Opinion

California Fruit Growers Exchange v. Gonska

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 8, 1943No. Civil Action No. 4352PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, District Judge.

This cause came on for trial and the Court having heard the evidence and rendered its decision, now makes its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law pursuant to Rule 52 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, as follows:

Findings of Fact.

1. Plaintiff, California Fruit Growers Exchange, is a non-profit, cooperative marketing association incorporated under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business at Los Angeles, California, and is engaged primarily in marketing, distributing and selling citrus fruits,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. California Fruit Growers Exchange v. Windsor Beverages, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Engineered Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Applied Mechanical Technology, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1984
  2. Pink Lady Corporation v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API