Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Pierce

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1918No. 2147PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to District Court, Otero County; Medler, Judge. Action by R. H. Pierce against Julia F. Morgan. Judgment for plaintiff, and after filing a supersedeas bond and without perfecting an appeal, defendant obtained a writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT.

ROBERTS, J.

A money judgment was rendered '/gainst the plaintiff in error in the district court of Otero county on the 10th day of May, 1917. From this judgment an appeal was granted by the district court on the 16th day of June, 1917, upon application of plaintiff in error, and on the 2d day of July, 1917, she filed a supersedeas bond, which was on said date approved by the clerk of 'the district court. After filing the super-sedeas bond, plaintiff in error took no further steps toward perfecting the appeal, and on the 8th day of October, 1917, applied to this court for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dailey v. FosterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Kinner v. DoddsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  3. Yell v. OutlawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1854

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blanchard v. State ex rel. WallaceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API