Vallee v. State

ON appellant’s motion for rehearing.

MORRISON, Judge.

Appellant’s able attorney in a scholarly brief has again presented for our consideration the many alleged errors reflected by his bills of exception. We shall limit our discussion here to one question.

In our original opinion, we did not discuss the legal effect of appellant’s testimony concerning the finding of the marijuana in the flour can.

The general rule has often been expressed by this court as follows:

“. . . a judgment will not be reversed because of the admission of testimony of officers respecting facts ascertained upon an illegal…