Brivis Enterprises, Inc. v. Von Plinski
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, J.
The defendants, Brivis Enterprises, Inc. (“Brivis”) and OllieRogers Too, Inc. (“Ol-lieRogers”), appeal the denial of their second amended motion to set aside default, following a trial on damages and entry of a final judgment. We affirm.
On May 5, 2006, the plaintiff, Teresita Von Plinski, etc., filed a wrongful death action against OllieRogers and Brivis, whose principal and registered agent is Roger Farrell. After several failed attempts at serving the summons and complaint at the registered office, on May 26, 2006, the process server delivered the summons and complaint to the business…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. BarberSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Otero v. Government Employees Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- FINKEL OUTDOOR PROD., INC. v. LaskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Brivis Enterprises, Inc. v. Von PlinskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
3Cited by8 opinions
- Emerald Coast Utilities Authority v. Bear Marcus Pointe, LLC a Florida limited etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- BIROL KARAN v. OMAR PERNIADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
- D.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Emerald Coast Utilities Authority v. Bear Marcus Pointe, LLC a Florida limited etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Jean-Philippe Schneider v. Christian TirikianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.