Legal Opinion

Stetz v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 28, 2009No. A09A1474PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Following a bench trial on stipulated facts, Justin Stetz appeals from his DUI per se conviction. In two enumerations, he contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for additional discovery. We disagree and affirm.

Stetz was stopped by a DeKalb County police officer for a safety belt violation. The officer arrested Stetz after he failed three field sobriety tests and an alco-sensor test of his breath registered positive for the presence of alcohol. The officer read Stetz the implied consent warning and Stetz agreed to take a state-administered chemical…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Birdsall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Cottrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Holowiak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. The State v. TanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API