Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Tuft

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1955No. 8292PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

This appeal involves the use of the motion to dismiss to object to improper venue. We hold that the motion to dismiss is inappropriate for such purpose.

Plaintiff commenced suit on a contract in the District Court for Salt Lake County, the complaint showing on its face that the defendant was a resident of Salina, Utah, in Sevier County. Plaintiff admits on this appeal that proper venue would have been Sevier rather than Salt Lake County.

Defendant filed a “Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue,” which the court denied. Notice of the denial was mailed to defendant September 9,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buckle v. Ogden Furniture & Carpet Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Sanipoli v. Pleasant Valley Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Pace v. Wolfe, District JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kish v. WrightUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Martel v. Inhabitants of Town of Old OrchardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Rudd v. Crown InternationalUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Cannon v. TuftUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Martel v. Inhabitants of Town of Old OrchardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API