Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert J. Baranov
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 9, 1973No. 26380PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Baranov appeals from a conviction for mailing obscene matter in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1461. We reverse.
The government’s case consisted of photographs, advertisements, a motion picture and proof of mailing.
As we are required to do, we have reviewed the evidence de novo. Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 84 S.Ct. 1676, 12 L.Ed.2d 793 (1964); Wasserman v. Municipal Court of the Alhambra Judicial Dist., 449 F.2d 787 (9th Cir. 1971); Childs v. Oregon, 431 F.2d 272 (9th Cir. 1970), rev’d on other grounds 401 U.S. 1006, 91 S.Ct. 1248, 28 L.Ed. 2d 542 (1971). We have found the usual tasteless…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Central Magazine Sales, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Huntington National Bank v. KosydarSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Potomac News Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. 392 Copies of a Magazine Entitled "Exclusive"District Court, D. Maryland · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robert A. Maheu, and v. Hughes Tool Company, a Corporation, Now Known as Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Robert A. Maheu, and v. Hughes Tool Company, a Corporation, Now Known as Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Robert J. BaranovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973