Legal Opinion

Boehm v. Boehm

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 22, 1917PublishedCited by 16 opinions

On final hearing on bill for maintenance.

1Opinion of the Court

Leaming, V. C.

Complainant’s bill has been filed pursuant to the provisions of the twenty-sixth section of our Divorce act and prays for an order to compel complainant’s husband to provide for her and her minor daughter suitable support and maintenance.

The defence which has been made by defendant is based upon the claim that a decree which was heretofore entered in this court in a similar suit requiring defendant to pay to complainant $10 per week for her support has been satisfied and discharged by a settlement made by the parties, in which settlement defendant paid to complainant an agreed…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dennison v. DennisonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  2. Cohen v. CohenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  3. Polyckronos v. PolyckronosNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  4. Baldwin v. KingstonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1918
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. CaspersenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API