Legal Opinion

State v. Comeaux

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided July 3, 1991No. 318-90PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MALONEY, Judge.

Pervis Joseph Comeaux, appellee, charged with driving while intoxicated, TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 6701Z-1, filed a pretrial motion to suppress the result of a blood alcohol content analysis conducted upon a sample of his blood. He argued that the blood sample was seized and analyzed in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution. The trial court granted ap-pellee’s motion and suppressed the State’s evidence of appellee’s blood alcohol content. The…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. State v. HardyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Carroll v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. State v. MartinezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2019

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API