Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 28, 2009No. 3D05-90PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion for Rehearing

ROTHENBERG, Judge.

The defendant’s motion for rehearing is denied. We, however, withdraw our former opinion dated January 31, 2007, and substitute the following opinion in its stead.

The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defense counsel’s peremptory challenge of a prospective juror. As we find no error, we affirm.

During jury selection, the defense moved to exercise a peremptory challenge to strike juror Buchholz. The following took place:

DEFENSE: We are going to ask for a peremptory on Mr. Buchholz, No. 12.

STATE: Judge, I would—

CO…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. NeilSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Melbourne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Windom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Franqui v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  5. State v. HolidaySupreme Court of Florida · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API