Legal Opinion

Hull v. Teafatiller

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1930No. 18741PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENNETT, C.

November 3, 1921, J. L. Hull and W. M. Janes brought suit in district court of Seminole county, Okla., against J. W. Teafatiller and W. S. Allen, as defendants, for partition of S. E. ¾ of S. E-¼ of sec. 10, twp. 9 north, range 7 E., containing 40 acres. The petition, in the usual form, in effect, sets out that plaintiffs and defendants each own an undivided one-fourth interest in said lands. The prayer is for partition in kind, or if impracticable, for a sale of the lands for division. A return, on summons directed to sheriff of Johnston county showed service upon J. IV.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. State v. WellsUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ingram v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Brandt v. LaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Morrison v. SwinkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Buckhorn Ranch PartnershipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. First State Bank of Strasburg v. SchmaltzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API