Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck and Co., and Cross-Appellant v. The Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co. And Admiral Insurance Co., and Cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 8, 1992No. 90-3242, 90-3349PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.

This indemnification action arises from a state products liability suit brought by the Mosleys, not parties to this action, against Sears, Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”), the plaintiff in the present case. The Mosleys claimed that Sears had sold them a defective bicycle which caused Mr. Mosley to injure himself. The Mosleys won a $400,-000 judgment from Sears, who incurred a total of $510,927.88 in liabilities, costs, and expenses in the underlying state action. Sears then sued Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co. (“Murray”), the manufacturer of the bicycle, and Admiral…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Elizabeth J. Bartlett, as of the Estate of Charles E. Grimes, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Richard C. Scarlata, Debtor. Goldberg Securities, Inc. v. Richard C. Scarlata, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Lisa S. Fine v. Ryan International Airlines, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. MojicaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Mohsin Siddiqui v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. MojicaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API