Legal Opinion

Beh v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1982No. Claim No. 60990Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the Court of Claims should be reinstated, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division.

The trial court “by necessary implication from its award of consequential damages” found the loss of direct access rendered the property unsuitable for its highest and best use (Priestly v State of New York, 23 NY2d 152, 155).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur; Judge Jasen dissents and votes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Priestly v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Beh v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API