Legal Opinion

Mayor v. Wood

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided July 22, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Eleventh district court. Action by the mayor, etc., of the city of Yew York, against Walter Wood and another, for a violation of an ordinance relating to signs. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Code Civil Proc.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Eleventh district court. Action by the mayor, etc., of the city of Yew York, against Walter Wood and another, for a violation of an ordinance relating to signs. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Code Civil Proc. H. Y. § 1897, provides that, jn action to recover a penalty given by statute, if a copy of the complaint be not served with the summons, a general reference to the statute in the form, “according to the provisions of,” must be indorsed on the copy of the summons so delivered, adding such a description of the statute as will conveniently identify it, etc.

1Per curiam

The summons was properly indorsed. The ordinance violated is article 4 of chapter 6 of the Revised Ordinances of 1880, and not only is it particularly mentioned, but its substance is indorsed upon the summons. The defendants thus had the means of ascertaining from the summons what ordinance they were charged with having violated, and of learning the provisions of the ordinance from the indorsement upon the summons. A fuller compliance with section 1897 of the Code, as that section was construed by this court in Mayor v. Eisler, 2 Civil Proc. R. 125, could not be desired.

It is argued that the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. O'NeilNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API