In re Wynne

OPINION OF THE COURT

The petitioner served the respondent with a petition dated May 17, 2000, which contained four charges of professional *56misconduct. After a hearing on August 9, 2000, the Special Referee sustained all of the charges. The petitioner now moves to confirm the Special Referee’s report and to impose such discipline upon the respondent as the Court deems just and proper. The respondent has not contested the charges and has submitted an affirmation requesting that the Court be as lenient as possible in imposing discipline.

Charge One alleges that the respondent has been convicted of…