Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Auld

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 1985No. D8310-67602; CA A31933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Husband appeals from a decree of dissolution. He assigns as error the trial court’s division of property and an award of spousal support and attorney fees to wife. We modify the spousal support and affirm the decree as modified.

The parties were married for nine years. There are no children. At the time of trial, husband was 33 and wife 30, and both were in good health. The parties met while both were attending college. After husband received his bachelor’s degree, they married and moved to Portland, where husband was employed. Wife continued school at Portland State University, where she…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of KitsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. In re the Marriage of FrishkoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. In re the Marriage of BrastadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of ArandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. In Re the Marriage of CrumpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. In re the Marriage of PokornyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. In re the Marriage of MarchioliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. In re the Marriage of WightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API