Legal Opinion
(PS) Iegorova v. Intercom Security
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 17, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01355Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LIUDMYLA IEGOROVA, No. 2:19-cv-1355-MCE-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. 14 INTERCOM SECURITY 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Liudmyla Iegorova, proceeding without counsel, commenced this action and 18 requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) 19 A federal court has an independent duty to assess whether federal subject matter 20 jurisdiction exists, whether or not the parties raise the issue. See United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. 21 Waddell & Reed Inc., 360…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Thomas L. Apple v. John Glenn, U.S. SenatorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Long Island Oil Products Co. v. Local 553 Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.