Legal Opinion

Rudasill v. Rudasill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1918No. 8199PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Grayson County; Silas Hare, Judge. Suit by Permalla C. Rudasill against Emanuel Rudasill and others. From interlocutory order, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.

Appellant sued appellee, Emanuel Rudasill, who will hereinafter be called appellee, for divorce and an adjustment and settlement of their property rights. Later and before the beginning of the term of the court to which the suit was returnable, three sons of‘appellant and appellee were made parties defendant by an amended petition; but their presence in the suit seems unimportant in determining .the questions raised on this appeal. The petition alleges, in substance, that appellant and appellee were married in Grayson county, Tex., in February, 1871, and that they have lived together in said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Graves v. Cameron, Castles & StoreyTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Neyland v. BendyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Baylor v. HopfTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Smalley v. PaineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Parrish v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wallace v. BriggsTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Janelli v. BondTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Roosth v. RoosthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Couch v. SpargerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Allied Store Utilities Co. v. Texas Sales & Service Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API