McCaslin v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
At the trial in which the appellant, Dennis McCaslin, was convicted of delivery of marijuana, the defense was entrapment. The entrapment issue was submitted to and rejected by the jury. McCaslin’s contention on appeal is that a verdict should have been directed in his favor because the court should have found he was entrapped as a matter of law. The issue is whether entrapment must be found as a matter of law when the testimony of the accused, showing entrapment, is not rebutted by evidence presented by the state. We hold the court was correct in refusing to direct a…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Rudy Notaro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- State v. McKinneyArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. SainzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Franks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Elders v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Womack v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.