Legal Opinion

Allan Fontenot v. Louisiana Board of Elementary and Secondary Education

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 15, 1986No. 86-3011PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

Allan Fontenot appeals a district court decision that he is not entitled to recover attorney’s fees. Fontenot claimed that he was entitled to recover such fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 or, in the alternative, under § 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794a, because he had secured a victory on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim that asserted causes of action under § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, and the Education of Handicapped Children’s Act (EHA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. The district court found that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Mrs. W. v. TirozziCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Mrs. W. v. TirozziCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Angela L. B/n/f Mrs. Zeta L. v. Pasadena Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. Georgia Association of Retarded Citizens v. Dr. Charles McDaniel in His Official Capacity as State Superintendent of SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Sharon Digre, for Herself and as Parent and Next Friend on Behalf of Sean Digre, a Minor v. Roseville Schools Independent District No. 623Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API