Legal Opinion
Hilmes v. Marlin Firearms Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 25, 1955No. Civ. No. 5232PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, Chief Judge.
This is a personal injury action for injuries sustained by plaintiff when a 12 gauge shotgun manufactured by defendant backfired while he was using it. The shotgun was an old model which .had been owned by several parties before coming into plaintiff’s possession. Where it was first sold and to whom does not appear!
The Marlin Firearms Company is not a corporation qualified to do business in Minnesota. It is a Connecticut corporation which maintains no office or listing in this State. Process was served upon one Charles E. Eggers/a member with one Tom Raymond of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pulson v. American Rolling Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Partin v. Michaels Art Bronze Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Schmidt v. Esquire, Inc. Schmidt v. Reader's Digest Ass'n, Inc. Schmidt v. Crowell-Collier Pub. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Rensing v. Turner Aviation CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
- Nerlund v. SchiavoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Twin City Scenic Co. v. Flambeau Plastics Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1960
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963