Legal Opinion

Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Hallgren

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1945No. 32003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court which denied a motion of the assignee of the plaintiff that the unpaid portion of a judgment against the defendant, Melvin V. Hallgren, be declared a lien upon the distributive *531share, being a one-fourth interest of the said defendant in the estate of his wife, Lillian J. Hallgren.

The plaintiff assigns as error that the refusal of the district court to impress this judgment as a lien on the defendant’s share of the said estate, which was not exempt, violates the law in reference thereto.

The transcript discloses that Emerson-Brantingham…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fremont Farmers Union Cooperative Ass'n v. MarkussenNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Orchard & Wilhelm Co. v. NorthNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. L. Oppenheimer & Co. v. MarrNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. LarsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hilton v. First Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API