Legal Opinion

Oregon v. Guzek

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 22, 2006No. 04-928PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer

Respondent Randy Lee Guzek was found guilty of capital murder and sentenced to death. On appeal, the Oregon Supreme Court affirmed the conviction but vacated the sentence and ordered a new sentencing proceeding. The question before the Court is whether the State may limit the innocence-related evidence he can introduce at that proceeding to the evidence he introduced at his original trial. We hold that the limitation does not violate the Constitution.

I

Oregon tried Guzek for the offense of capital murder. The evidence showed that Guzek and two associates decided to burglarize the Houser family…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Mason, L., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Abdul-Kabir v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. State v. EllisonArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Galloway v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. PuksarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API